Monday, January 07, 2008

The Fallacy of the Fair Tax

No self-respecting liberal - and no self-respecting progressive - should be enticed by the "fair-tax" proposal floating around in the political debates. Oh yes, it's appealing to think of getting rid of the IRS and the incredibly convoluted tax structure we now have - but there are ways of fixing things without hammering the poorest of the poor in this nation.

Here's what the fair-tax proposal entails (from
MSNBC)



Under the plan, Americans would pay only one federal tax, which would be applied to just about everything they buy: not just the goods people buy at stores on which most states assess a sales tax, but nearly all services, including health care and insurance, the purchase of a new home or rental of an apartment, even things like a teenager mowing a lawn or baby-sitting for a neighbor.

Now, it doesn't take a genius to realize that the poor in this country will be paying sales tax on 100% of their income - they spend everything they earn on essentials - food, housing, clothing, etc. The wealthy only spend a portion of their income on taxable items - they spend some of their income on investments (Certificates of Deposit, bonds, stocks, etc., which you will note are missing from the list of taxable items in the box above.) Which means the wealthy are taxed on a much lower percentage of their income and therefore they will pay a much lower tax rate. Which is why the rich (like Steve Forbes) LOVE the fair tax...poor people bear the brunt of the cost of running the country.
Here's more on the fallacy of the fair-tax from MSNBC...



It is not the same as a normal sales tax, however. Under the proposal, the tax is included first. That means a $100 item would cost $130, or 30 percent more. The plan’s supporters say that works out as a 23 percent rate because $30 is 23 percent of $130. Americans would no longer face federal withholding from their paychecks. But most analysts say the tax rate necessary to replace current federal revenues, under any likely plan, would actually need to be much higher. By some estimates it could add 40 percent, if not more, to the cost of living.

Now, having studied math in school quite extensively, I can tell you that this is just plain quackery of the highest order. A percent is calculated based on the price BEFORE the tax is added, not after. It is false arithmetic - sort of like telling you that 2 + 2 = 5 and expecting you to agree just because they say so.
But even more importantly, they are ignoring all of the state and local sales taxes most of us pay. Here in NY State, we are already paying an 8% and up sales tax - this would bring the sales tax north of 38% (best estimate) and maybe close to 50%!!!!

MSNBC adds this...


Whatever the rate, critics say, a steep federal retail tax, piled on top of existing state sales taxes, would encourage widespread illegal tax evasion, black market transactions and other forms of cheating, creating a cycle that would require even higher tax rates.

2 comments:

xraydid said...

Number ONE: I do not see the fallacy in the fact that the poor will pay tax on all their income. They will ALSO Get ALL their income (less state tax).The Rich, may be you are one, will also pay tax on ALL they Spend. Not like now with all the loop holes, some of which I currently take advantage of. As you mentioned there is also a welfare payment made to the poor on a sliding bases which gives the poor an incentive to MAKE more money not TAKE more Money (not the way it is now).
Number TWO. You make No mention of the Billions that will be saved by NOT having an IRS. (Oh, and the poor will not have to pay to have their taxes figured out, or be penalized by not filing on time.) Most states are already collecting sales tax and All states already have a tax Department that can continue to collect taxes both state and Federal fairTax. It will be up to each state to find the most efficient means of collecting taxes and therefor It might even become a competition to see which state can be the most efficient(No comparison to now) which would most likely lead to only sales tax and no state income tax. Almost Every point you make is addressed on Fairtax.org ! I say Vote YES HR25/s Fair Tax and Vote for Ron Paul. There can be no denying facts with out lying.

xraydid said...

Thank you for allowing me to comment about your most knowledgeable article. Although you make some very valid observations, you did not carry them out far enough. There is a great deal of information and explanation at Fairtax.org