Dara Lind · Monday, March 28, 2016, 10:06 am
It's been a quarter-century since a former criminal defense lawyer sat on the Supreme Court.
Since then, crime has fallen by half. Incarceration has risen, then fallen (slightly) again. Americans are becoming more and more critical of the "tough-on-crime" mindset that defined the end of the 20th century, and more skeptical that police and prosecutors will always use their powers for good — in other words, they're coming in line with how defense lawyers see the world.
But when Barack Obama made his third (and likely final) Supreme Court nomination last week, he nominated Merrick Garland.
Garland is a former prosecutor with a tough-on-crime record. The court already has two ex-prosecutors.
Appellate defense lawyer Anthony O'Toole points out that the Court has veterans of both sides of civil cases (defendants' and plaintiffs' lawyers), and one side of criminal cases (prosecutors). "But the one group that seems kind of outside that box, particularly on the Supreme Court, are defense lawyers. And that's a shame."
Defense lawyers and scholars worry this isn't an accident: it's the result of the structure that shapes who can get nominated to the Supreme Court to begin with. Federal judges tend to be people who "ticked all the political checkboxes on their career starting from when they were 15," says Tejas Bhatt, assistant public defender for New Haven, Connecticut. One of those boxes, often, is working as a prosecutor.
Even beyond any particular career experience, the system rewards "people who don't take controversial positions, they don't do controversial things, who don't issue controversial opinions, who do seem to hew more toward law and order and enforcement."
Read more
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/28/11306422/supreme-court-prosecutors-career
This blog will focus on political images I have found all around the Internet, though I will intersperse some commentary and quotes that I find interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment