Showing posts with label voting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voting. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 22, 2022
Saturday, March 23, 2019
Friday, June 21, 2013
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Monday, May 06, 2013
Background checks
Another one of those arguments that seems righteous on the surface, but really - should there be background checks on the right to vote? This is not a good argument for liberals to push.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Republicans: Vote no, hope yes
From Daily Kos...
Boehner explains the GOP's 'Vote No, Hope Yes' legislative strategy
from Daily Kos by (Jed Lewison)
When the House passed the Violence Against Women Act last week, it was the third time this year that House Speaker John Boehner relied primarily on Democratic votes to pass a piece of legislation. Today, he explained why he supported moving forward with the legislation even though a majority of Republicans opposed it:
"We tried everything we could to get the differences in our conference resolved," Boehner said Tuesday of moving a Democratic version of VAWA last week. "And the fact is they couldn't resolve their differences. It was time to deal with this issue and we did."
So, according to Boehner, VAWA was a bill that needed to pass, and Republicans weren't capable of coming up with a version that could pass. The solution: push the GOP to the side and let the Democrats lead the way.
But even though Boehner has now allowed three votes so far this year on bills opposed by a majority of the House Republican Conference, he's not actually going against the wishes of his party. It's the exact opposite, in fact-a strategy that Ashley Parker of the New York Times dubbed "Vote No, Hope Yes."
The basic idea of Vote No, Hope Yes is that many Republicans realize that they can't stand in the way of must-pass legislation like the fiscal cliff deal, VAWA or Hurricane Sandy. At the same time, they can't bring themselves to support it, so they try to split the difference by allowing the legislation to come up, and then voting against it while simultaneously hoping it will pass.
Boehner explains the GOP's 'Vote No, Hope Yes' legislative strategy
from Daily Kos by (Jed Lewison)
When the House passed the Violence Against Women Act last week, it was the third time this year that House Speaker John Boehner relied primarily on Democratic votes to pass a piece of legislation. Today, he explained why he supported moving forward with the legislation even though a majority of Republicans opposed it:
"We tried everything we could to get the differences in our conference resolved," Boehner said Tuesday of moving a Democratic version of VAWA last week. "And the fact is they couldn't resolve their differences. It was time to deal with this issue and we did."
So, according to Boehner, VAWA was a bill that needed to pass, and Republicans weren't capable of coming up with a version that could pass. The solution: push the GOP to the side and let the Democrats lead the way.
But even though Boehner has now allowed three votes so far this year on bills opposed by a majority of the House Republican Conference, he's not actually going against the wishes of his party. It's the exact opposite, in fact-a strategy that Ashley Parker of the New York Times dubbed "Vote No, Hope Yes."
The basic idea of Vote No, Hope Yes is that many Republicans realize that they can't stand in the way of must-pass legislation like the fiscal cliff deal, VAWA or Hurricane Sandy. At the same time, they can't bring themselves to support it, so they try to split the difference by allowing the legislation to come up, and then voting against it while simultaneously hoping it will pass.
Labels:
Boehner,
House of Representatives,
republicans,
voting
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Vote for people who will make a difference
Methinks that there a lot of people who claim to hate government that don't really hate government - they hate that they don't get their way everyday. They'd like government just fine if everybody who voted just agreed with THEM all of the time. Small minded Republicans would love it if their government were run by a white man who was banning abortions, praying in public, and sending them each boatloads of cash. Just sayin'.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Voting
Casting a ballot sends a message to politicians. Here's some of what voters were saying - was anyone listening?
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Wednesday, June 01, 2011
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Voters uninformed
I watched it for years as a local union leader - people voting against their own best interests. I've no idea what motivates them, but whether it is family tradition to vote conservative values, or religion, or historical ignorance, they will do it - and they will do it in droves. More proof...
I have no sympathy for seniors complaining about dismantling Medicare. You old, uninformed, easily confused, overly religious morons voted for Republicans - did you think YOUR benefits were somehow off-limits?
I have no sympathy for seniors complaining about dismantling Medicare. You old, uninformed, easily confused, overly religious morons voted for Republicans - did you think YOUR benefits were somehow off-limits?
Monday, June 28, 2010
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Thursday, January 07, 2010
Saturday, January 02, 2010
Monday, February 02, 2009
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



































