This blog will focus on political images I have found all around the Internet, though I will intersperse some commentary and quotes that I find interesting.
Showing posts with label Gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gingrich. Show all posts
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Monday, March 12, 2007
Did You Know - Newt Gingrich
From OpEdNews.com - read more here...
When former Georgia congressman Newt Gingrich needed to unload (no pun intended) about his extramarital affair, he selected Dobson to interview him. This urge to purge is politically motivated, undoubtedly. Seems Newt is testing the base of the Republican Party, airing his cheating past to see if an admission to indiscretion will hinder a run for the presidency. “There are times that I have fallen short of my own standards. There’s certainly times when I’ve fallen short of God’s standards,” said Newt. Oh, what perfectly chosen words. The mention of “God” is particularly priceless.
Of course, in his confession, he implies that his indiscretion was much less worse that Bill Clinton's because Clinton lied under oath about his affair. But my question is - why was Clinton asked about an affair under oath? Why was it anyone else's business if Newt's wasn't our business? Bunch of hypocrites, if you ask me, but then - I make that point at least weekly in this blog.
When former Georgia congressman Newt Gingrich needed to unload (no pun intended) about his extramarital affair, he selected Dobson to interview him. This urge to purge is politically motivated, undoubtedly. Seems Newt is testing the base of the Republican Party, airing his cheating past to see if an admission to indiscretion will hinder a run for the presidency. “There are times that I have fallen short of my own standards. There’s certainly times when I’ve fallen short of God’s standards,” said Newt. Oh, what perfectly chosen words. The mention of “God” is particularly priceless.
Of course, in his confession, he implies that his indiscretion was much less worse that Bill Clinton's because Clinton lied under oath about his affair. But my question is - why was Clinton asked about an affair under oath? Why was it anyone else's business if Newt's wasn't our business? Bunch of hypocrites, if you ask me, but then - I make that point at least weekly in this blog.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Unbelievable
From the Union-Leader...
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich yesterday said the country will be forced to reexamine freedom of speech to meet the threat of terrorism.
Gingrich, speaking at a Manchester awards banquet, said a "different set of rules" may be needed to reduce terrorists' ability to use the Internet and free speech to recruit and get out their message.
In other words, we have to give up our freedoms and rights in order to save our - what? dictatorship? Given his argument, why not just capitulate to the terrorists now? Stupid bunghole!
Monday, October 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)