Looking at the nuance in the consideration of any particular issue is difficult for conservatives. Everything looks pretty much black-and-white to them. If people riot when a police officer kills an unarmed black man and then gets off scott free, the conservative wants to know why, when a "terrorist" (not proven, as I write this) kills four (now five) members of the military and then is shot and killed himself, people aren't rioting.
It's difficult for me to decide if they don't WANT to see the difference (the police officer got away with murder, the murderer was killed), or if their minds are just too small to see the difference. Any clues?
No comments:
Post a Comment